I once had a client—a high-volume WooCommerce shop—who was convinced that adding a “Quick Reorder” button on the customer dashboard would skyrocket their repeat sales. We shipped it in a week. Clean code, perfect UI, zero bugs. A month later? Crickets. Total nightmare. The conversion rate didn’t budge, and the client was looking at me like I’d sold them a lemon. I spent three days tweaking the button’s CSS, thinking maybe it didn’t “pop” enough. Total waste of time. The styling wasn’t the issue; we just had no idea how to measure feature impact properly.
In the developer world, we often fall into the trap of thinking “it’s live, so it’s working.” But if you aren’t tracking the right signals, you’re just flying blind. I eventually stumbled across a concept called the TARS framework in an article over at Smashing Magazine, and it changed how I talk to clients about “success.” It moves the needle away from broad conversion rates and looks at what’s actually happening under the hood.
Why Conversion Rate is a Liar
Here’s the kicker: conversion rate is a terrible way to measure a specific feature. Why? Because a million things affect it. Maybe your marketing team ran a bad campaign, or maybe there’s a latency issue in your REST API. You can have a great UX and low conversion, or a “total mess” of a UI and high conversion because the product is exclusive. To actually see if a feature works, you need to break it down. Period.
That’s where TARS comes in. It stands for Target Audience, Adoption, Retention, and Satisfaction. Instead of looking at the whole shop, you look at the percentage of users who actually need the feature and track them specifically. For my “Quick Reorder” button, I realized only 5% of users were actually repeat customers. My “target audience” was tiny. No wonder the overall conversion didn’t move.
Tracking Adoption with Code
If you want to measure feature impact, you need to hook into the usage events. Don’t just rely on page views. You want to know if they clicked the button and, more importantly, if it solved their problem. Here is a simple way I usually set up a tracking hook in WordPress to log these events without bloating the database.
/**
* Track custom feature usage for TARS metrics
*
* @param int $user_id The ID of the user.
* @param string $feature_name Unique slug for the feature.
*/
function bbioon_track_feature_event( $user_id, $feature_name ) {
// We don't want to flood the main options table.
// Use a custom table or a lightweight logging service.
$timestamp = current_time( 'mysql' );
// Example: Logging to a custom telemetry endpoint
$log_entry = array(
'user_id' => $user_id,
'feature' => esc_attr( $feature_name ),
'event_time' => $timestamp,
'is_returning' => bbioon_check_if_retained( $user_id, $feature_name )
);
// In a real scenario, you'd send this to a tool like Segment or Mixpanel
// Or even just a local custom table for internal audits.
error_log( "Feature Usage: " . json_encode( $log_entry ) );
}
/**
* Check if the user has used this feature before (Retention)
*/
function bbioon_check_if_retained( $user_id, $feature_name ) {
// Logic to check historical usage
return get_user_meta( $user_id, '_bbioon_used_' . $feature_name, true ) ? true : false;
}Once you have this data, you can map it out. High adoption but low retention? Your feature is interesting but doesn’t actually help. High retention but low satisfaction? They’re using it because they have to, not because they like it. This level of detail is why better developer documentation and clear planning save businesses a fortune in the long run.
The Reality Check
Building “shiny things” is easy. Proving they provide value is the hard part. I’ve seen teams spend six months on a feature that only 2% of their target audience used. If they had used a repeatable metric like TARS or explored the original concepts by Adrian Raudaschl, they would have caught the failure in week two. Trust me on this: data doesn’t care about your feelings or your “clean” code.
Look, this stuff gets complicated fast. If you’re tired of debugging someone else’s mess and just want your site to work with actual, measurable results, drop me a line. I’ve probably seen it before.
Are you still measuring success by looking at the total sales graph, or are you actually looking at how your users interact with what you build?
Leave a Reply