Taming WordPress AI: Abilities API & Centralized Settings

I had a client recently, a real go-getter, who’d been experimenting with AI on their WordPress site. They’d cobbled together a few different AI features from various plugins, and honestly, the initial results were pretty impressive. But then, as these things always do, it scaled. More features, different AI providers, and suddenly their admin area was a total mess. Every AI integration had its own quirky settings screen, demanding API keys they’d already entered elsewhere. Configuration became a nightmare. It was a classic "WordPress AI Abilities API" headache in the making, and it needed a proper solution, not another band-aid.

My first thought, and I’ll admit, it was a bit naive looking back, was to just build a custom settings page for *their* specific integrations. A simple database table, a few text fields, done. And yeah, that would’ve "worked" for their current setup. But then what? Every new AI tool, every new provider, would mean another custom fix. That’s shipping tech debt, pure and simple. It’s exactly the kind of unscalable chaos that drives developers, and more importantly, clients, absolutely insane. We needed a system, a framework, not just another one-off hack.

Standardizing WordPress AI Abilities and Settings

This isn’t a unique problem, not by a long shot. The push for a structured way to handle AI capabilities within WordPress core is happening right now, and for good reason. Just look at the discussions coming out of the Core-AI Contributor Check-ins. I caught the summary from October 8th, 2025, over at make.wordpress.org/ai, and it’s clear they’re tackling the exact pain points I’ve seen firsthand.

One of the biggest takeaways? The need for a proper "grouping mechanism (like ‘categories’)" for what they’re calling the Abilities API. Think about it: if every AI tool just registers itself without any classification, you’re going to end up with a "wild west" of thousands of abilities. How do you find anything? How do you filter? It becomes unusable. Requiring a category from day one for any new AI ability? Smart move. Trust me on this, organization from the start saves endless headaches down the road.

They’re also nailing down definitions for arguments. We’re talking about what goes into the root-level arguments—the stuff absolutely essential to make the AI action execute, like input/output schemas. And then what falls into a ‘meta’ object—all the descriptive, optional, or experimental stuff. This clear boundary means we get a predictable API that works, without being bloated with non-essential data when it’s not needed. It’s the kind of API design discipline that matters, ensuring future extensibility without sacrificing stability now.

<?php
/**
 * Registers a new AI ability with categories and structured arguments.
 *
 * @param array $ability_args Arguments for the AI ability.
 * @return bool True on success, false on failure.
 */
function bbioon_register_ai_ability( $ability_args ) {
    $defaults = array(
        'id'          => '',
        'name'        => '',
        'description' => '',
        'category'    => 'general', // Crucial grouping mechanism.
        'schema'      => array(),  // Root-level: required for execution.
        'callback'    => null,
        'meta'        => array(),  // Optional: descriptive, non-essential.
    );

    $args = wp_parse_args( $ability_args, $defaults );

    if ( empty( $args['id'] ) || empty( $args['name'] ) ) {
        return false; // Man, gotta have an ID and name.
    }

    // In a real scenario, this would register with a global AI Abilities API.
    // For now, let's just log it.
    error_log( 'Registered AI Ability: ' . print_r( $args, true ) );

    return true;
}

// Example usage:
bbioon_register_ai_ability( array(
    'id'          => 'bbioon_image_generator',
    'name'        => 'Image Generation',
    'description' => 'Generates images based on text prompts.',
    'category'    => 'content_creation',
    'schema'      => array(
        'input'  => '{ "type": "string", "description": "Text prompt for image" }',
        'output' => '{ "type": "string", "description": "URL of generated image" }',
    ),
    'callback'    => 'bbioon_generate_image_callback',
    'meta'        => array(
        'show_in_rest' => true,
        'version'      => '1.0',
    ),
) );

And then there’s the whole user experience for AI settings. This is the kicker, man. My client’s problem with scattered API credentials? It’s a recognized "highest friction point" for user adoption. The solution being discussed is a centralized provider settings screen. One place to configure your OpenAI, Gemini, or whatever else credentials. Then, individual AI features can simply leverage that central configuration or offer a graceful flow (like a modal) to add a new provider without forcing a full page redirect. This isn’t just about developer convenience; it’s about making AI in WordPress actually usable for everyone else.

Making AI in WordPress Work for Everyone

What this all boils down to is foresight. Building a robust, scalable AI ecosystem in WordPress isn’t about rushing out features. It’s about laying down solid foundations: clear API definitions, necessary grouping mechanisms like categories, and a user experience that doesn’t make people want to pull their hair out. These core discussions are critical for ensuring that as AI evolves within WordPress, it does so in a way that’s manageable, powerful, and genuinely helpful.

Look, this stuff gets complicated fast. If you’re tired of debugging someone else’s mess and just want your site to work, drop my team a line. We’ve probably seen it before.

Ahmad Wael

See Full Bio