WordPress AI Architecture: Plugin or Composer Library?

Just last month, a client came to us with an ambitious vision: integrating advanced AI functionalities deeply into their high-traffic WordPress platform. They’d already played around with a few off-the-shelf AI plugins, and while those offered a quick proof-of-concept, the client quickly hit a wall when it came to custom models, scaling, and maintaining compatibility with their existing, complex tech stack. It was a classic “quick fix now, total nightmare later” scenario. The core problem wasn’t the AI itself, but the underlying WordPress AI architecture.

My first thought, I’ll admit, was to see if we could just extend one of those existing plugins. And yeah, for about five minutes, it looked like it might work. But as soon as we started digging into the nuances of their requirements – custom data pipelines, unique training models, and robust error handling – it became glaringly clear. A simple plugin, designed for generic use, was going to turn into a spaghetti code monster. We needed a foundational approach, not another band-aid.

This isn’t just my opinion; it’s a conversation happening at the highest levels of WordPress development. Look at the recent Core AI meeting summary from August 21st, 2025 (you can find the full notes over at make.wordpress.org/ai). One of the key discussions revolved around the “MCP Adapter Distribution.” The big question: should it be a canonical plugin or a Composer library? This, man, is the exact architectural crossroads many developers face with advanced WordPress AI integration.

When you’re building something truly integral, something that other components will rely on, choosing a Composer library offers significant advantages. We’re talking proper dependency management, versioning, and a cleaner separation of concerns. A canonical plugin, while seemingly simpler for distribution, can lead to tightly coupled dependencies and make future updates or system extensions a real pain. Trust me on this: avoiding technical debt upfront is always cheaper than refactoring later.

Crafting a Robust WordPress AI Architecture

Beyond the “how” of distribution, there’s the “what” of responsible AI. The documentation team, for instance, proposed a “Responsible AI workflow for creating new documentation for WordPress 6.9.” Their goal? Teach AI the “language of WordPress” – distinguishing between WP.com, WP.org, and the software itself. This isn’t just about code; it’s about creating intelligent systems that understand context. And that kind of contextual intelligence requires a solid, extensible architecture.

So, what does this look like in practice? Instead of throwing everything into one plugin, consider a more modular, Composer-driven approach where core AI services are independent packages. Then, use WordPress hooks to integrate them cleanly. Here’s a simplified example of how you might hook into an AI service that processes content, ensuring it’s extendable and manageable:

<?php
/**
 * Plugin Name: Bbioon AI Content Processor
 * Description: Integrates a modular AI content processing service.
 * Version: 1.0.0
 * Author: Ahmad Wael
 * Text Domain: bbioon-ai-content
 */

// If this file is called directly, abort.
if ( ! defined( 'WPINC' ) ) {
    die;
}

/**
 * Main class for the Bbioon AI Content Processor.
 */
class Bbioon_AI_Content_Processor {

    public function __construct() {
        add_filter( 'bbioon_preprocess_content_for_ai', [ $this, 'bbioon_run_ai_processing' ], 10, 2 );
        add_action( 'save_post', [ $this, 'bbioon_trigger_ai_on_post_save' ], 10, 3 );
    }

    /**
     * Placeholder for running actual AI processing.
     *
     * @param string $content The content to process.
     * @param int    $post_id The ID of the post.
     * @return string The processed content.
     */
    public function bbioon_run_ai_processing( $content, $post_id ) {
        // In a real scenario, this would interact with an AI service,
        // likely loaded via Composer and configured.
        if ( apply_filters( 'bbioon_should_process_ai_for_post', true, $post_id ) ) {
            // Example: Append a small AI-generated summary.
            $ai_summary = Bbioon_AI_Service_Adapter::get_instance()->summarize( $content );
            return $content . '<!-- AI Summary -->' . $ai_summary;
        }
        return $content;
    }

    /**
     * Triggers AI processing when a post is saved.
     *
     * @param int     $post_id The post ID.
     * @param WP_Post $post    The post object.
     * @param bool    $update  Whether this is an update or a new post.
     */
    public function bbioon_trigger_ai_on_post_save( $post_id, $post, $update ) {
        if ( defined( 'DOING_AUTOSAVE' ) && DOING_AUTOSAVE ) {
            return;
        }
        if ( 'post' !== $post->post_type && 'page' !== $post->post_type ) {
            return;
        }

        $processed_content = apply_filters( 'bbioon_preprocess_content_for_ai', $post->post_content, $post_id );

        // Update post with AI-processed content if different.
        if ( $processed_content !== $post->post_content ) {
            remove_action( 'save_post', [ $this, 'bbioon_trigger_ai_on_post_save' ] ); // Prevent infinite loop.
            wp_update_post( [
                'ID'           => $post_id,
                'post_content' => $processed_content,
            ] );
            add_action( 'save_post', [ $this, 'bbioon_trigger_ai_on_post_save' ], 10, 3 ); // Re-add action.
        }
    }
}

new Bbioon_AI_Content_Processor();

This code illustrates a simple hook (`bbioon_preprocess_content_for_ai`) and an action (`save_post`) that allows you to cleanly inject AI processing. The actual AI service (e.g., `Bbioon_AI_Service_Adapter`) would be a Composer-managed library, keeping your core plugin lean and focused on integration, not implementation details. This gives you flexibility. That’s the real point. You can swap out AI models, update libraries, or even extend functionalities without tearing your entire site apart. It’s about building for stability and scalability from day one.

Strategic Choices for Long-Term AI Success

The lesson here is simple: whether you’re looking at a new AI feature or any significant integration, rushing the architectural decision will always bite you later. For foundational pieces like a Core AI adapter, the discussion around canonical plugin versus Composer library isn’t just academic; it dictates the maintainability, performance, and future flexibility of your entire WordPress implementation. Strategic choices upfront prevent costly headaches down the line.

Look, this stuff gets complicated fast. If you’re tired of debugging someone else’s mess and just want your site to work, drop my team a line. We’ve probably seen it before.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *